Pulcinella Suite
Igor Stravinsky
(1882-1971)
Without a doubt the supreme influence upon Igor Stravinsky was his twenty year association with Sergei Diaghilev and the Ballets Russes, a period extending from the Firebird Ballet (1909-10) to Apollo (1928). Diaghilev had a unique gift for discovering discovering remarkable creative figures, and fostering stimulating collaborative relationships among composers, choreographers and graphic artists which would have an impact in the world of music and dance through much of the 20th century. Following the sensational 1913 premiere of Sacre du Printemps which revealed the 30 year-old Stravinsky as the most significant figure of of his generation there was excited speculation regarding what would be the next stage in these exciting developments. But there was not to be a 1914 season. With the outbreak of World War I the theatres of Paris were closed, and Stravinsky retreated to Switzerland with his family. Cut off from the lavish resources of the Ballets Russes, and working within wartime restrictions, Stravinsky composed a number of small-scale works, notably the Histoire du Soldat (which was performed by the Princeton Chamber Symphony in the 1990 season). With the end of the war Stravinsky returned to Paris, a city which overnight became a place of exile for Russian artists cut off from their homeland by the Bolshevik Revolution. While Paris had been home for the Stravinsky and the Diaghilev company for a number of years, their spiritual roots were in a Russia which few of them would ever see again. (Only in 1962 would Stravinsky was to return his motherland, now the Soviet Union.)
In 1919 Diaghilev approached Stravinsky with a proposal for a new work for Paris which initially struck the composer as “quite mad”: to prepare an orchestral arrangement of a miscellany of pieces by Giambattista Pergolesi (1710-1736) for a ballet in an 18th century COMMEDIA DELL’ARTE setting. (There had been several recent successful ballets of a similar nature, such as Respighi’s BOUTIQUE FANTASQUE (on music of Rossini), and Tommasini’s GOOD-HUMOURED LADIES (on music of Scarlatti.) Diaghilev offered the inviting prospect of working with Picasso (scenery and costumes) and Massine (choreography), as well as the promise of some ready cash---Stravinsky, as usual, was in debt. Oddly, what might be described as “high-class hackwork” became a labour of love, and in hindsight can be viewed as a turning point in Stravinsky’s career, marking the first step in the development of his “Neo-Classic” style. Stravinsky laid out a work in 18 short movements for a chamber orchestra of 33 players, in a striking contrast to the colossal orchestra required for SACRE DU PRINTEMPS. It calls for winds (without clarinets), brass, timpani, three solo singers, and a body of strings strings divided into CONCERTINO and RIPIENO in the manner of the 18th century CONCERTO GROSSO.
Pergolesi’s melodies and bass-lines are retained, as well as the basic 18th century harmonic language and rhythmic figures. But similar to Picasso’s use of the work of earlier painters (such as Velasquez) as a springboard for fresh and original artistic experiments, Stravinsky relishes the opportunity to rummage through the stock ingredients of 18th century Italian music, almost as if encountering them for the first time. The listener is teased by phrase patterns in which beats are unexpectedly cut out, others added; unremarkable melodies take on a piquant tang with touches of dissonance; basic tonic and dominant chords bump into each other with amusing results, while new lines of counterpoint are threaded through the musical texture. Stravinsky seems to strip music down to its nuts and bolts, putting everything again according to his own pleasure---not for nothing did he once describe himself in a passport application as an “inventor of music”! The warmth and affection with which this is accomplished makes PULCINELLA perhaps Stravinsky’s most loveable composition. As White put it, “Stravinsky speaks of his relationship to Pergolesi and his music in terms suitable to a love affair. This was no rape, but a seduction, carefully planned, successfully carried out, and vastly enjoyed---at least by Stravinsky!”
The1920 premiere was a huge success, delighting (and baffling) an audience which had come prepared for another musical onslaught in the manner of SACRE DU PRINTEMPS by this unexpected shift in the composer’s style. They could not know (and even Stravinsky himself might not have understood at the time) that the composer, now estranged from his native country, was beginning to forge a unique relationship to the Western European musical tradition from which Russian musicians had been largely excluded. As Stravinsky said, “PULCINELLA was my discovery of the past, the epiphany through which the whole of my late work became possible. It was a backward look, of course---the first of many love affairs in that direction---but it was a look in the mirror, too.” Thus began the “Neo-Classic” period in Stravinsky’s career, spanning thirty years, extending into the music composed during his first ten years as a resident in California, as was exemplified by the DANSES CONCERTANTES, heard in the December Princeton Chamber Symphony concert.)
A concert suite drawn from the complete PULCINELLA ballet was first performed by Pierre Monteux and the Boston Symphony on 22 December, 1922. The movements are as follows:
1. SINFONIA (Overture) – a solid, forthright introductory piece in G Major, somewhat pompous and theatrical in manner.
2. SERENATA – originally written for voice, solo oboe and solo violin now do the singing
over a rustling string accompaniment, with murmuring flute. Wistful and tender in mood,
the essence of the Italian operatic idiom.
3. SCHERZINO. Three movements in one: a brilliantly-coloured C Major section, frisky and cheerful in mood, giving way to a scurrying section in A Major, with
breathless passage work in the strings, and a concluding section in F Major, somewhat pastoral in tone, shyly skipping away in the closing bars.
4. TARANTELLA. This most Italianate of the movements is coloured by the sound of open strings and strumming PIZZICATO figures, with cross-rhythms and breathless forward momentum.
5. TOCCATA. A brief, fanfare-like movement bringing the brass to the fore, with humourous bangs on unexpected beats and an atmosphere of amiable pomposity.
6. GAVOTTA (with 2 variations). This movement provides an interlude of quiet coolness, with the instrumentation limited to winds and brass (mostly horns). The first variation is scored for an octet of winds and brass, the second featuring a dialogue between flute and horn against the rustic clucking of bassoons.
7. VIVO. One of the great examples of musical buffoonery, this uproarious movement features an unlikely duet between solo trombone and solo string bass, with rhythmic teasing and a a touch of mock pathos.
8. MINUETTO. An oddly march-like, mysterious little movement, most “unminuetlike” in character. The trombone once again has a moment of CANTABILE, the music gradually pressing forward in increasing sonority to move directly into the FINALE.
9. FINALE. The principal melodic phrase is as hackneyed a string of nine notes as can be imagined, which sports and gambols onward with exhilarating rhythmic twists and ostinato patterns. Unlikely echoes of the “Danse Sacrale” from SACRE DU PRINTEMPS sneak in along the way, the solo trumpet wheeling forward to a cadential slam-dunk.